|
To explore the implementation of the educational intervention
|
Reach
|
The percentage and characteristics of persons who receive or are affected by the educational intervention
|
1. Numbers and descriptives on GPs’, PWD’s and FCs’ cluster-RCT invitation and participation
|
1. Electronic database
|
|
2. Mail from GPs
|
|
2. Selection procedure used by GPs
|
3. Educational intervention attendance form
|
|
3. Numbers on educational intervention attendance of GPs and PNs
|
|
4. Telephone call
|
|
4. Reasons why PWD/FC declined study participation
|
5. Electronic survey completed by GPs (item 1)
|
|
5. GPs’ barriers on cluster- RCT inclusion of PWD/FCs
|
|
Acceptability
|
The perception among stakeholders that the intervention is agreeable
|
1. GPs’ and PNs’ educational intervention evaluation
|
1. Educational intervention evaluation form
|
|
2. Trainers’ educational intervention experiences
|
|
2. Focus group interviews with trainers
|
|
To explore the intervention’s mechanisms impact on everyday life
|
Adoption
|
The intention or initial decision to try to employ the intervention
|
1. Descriptives on GPs’, PWD’s and FCs who did or did not had ACP
|
1. Electronic database
|
|
2. Electronic survey completed by GPs (item 2)
|
|
2. GPs’ barriers on ACP initiation with PWD/FCs
|
|
3. Documented ACP conversations with PWD
|
3. PWD’s medical files
|
|
Appropriateness
|
The perceived fit or relevance of the intervention in a particular setting
|
1. Experiences of GPs with ACP in daily practice
|
1. Electronic survey completed by GPs (item 3–8)
|
|
2. ACP experiences of PWD and FCs with ACP in daily practice
|
|
2. Interviews with PWD and FCs
|
