You are viewing the site in preview mode
Skip to main content
|
Year
|
Regional classification
|
Family doctor system coverage and contract situation
|
|---|
|
Coverage of community health service stations (%)
|
Covering the proportion of village clinics (%)
|
Rate of contract permanent residents (%)
|
Rate of contract household residents (%)
|
Rate of contract resident families(%)
|
|---|
|
2013
|
Urban division
|
52/53(98.1)
|
0(0.0)
|
7,123,145/1659332(42.9)
|
501,629/1135807(44.2)
|
418,829/582929(71.9)
|
|
Suburban district
|
29/29(100.0)
|
34/42(81.0)
|
449,309/1177420(38.2)
|
324,248/448081(72.4)
|
206,551/433250(47.7)
|
|
Rural area
|
23/25(92.0)
|
269/275(97.8)
|
834,083/2262285(36.9)
|
655,649/1075640(61.0)
|
380,480/797488(47.7)
|
|
Total
|
104/107(97.2)
|
303/317(95.6)
|
1,995,706/5099037(39.1)
|
1,481,526/2659528(55.7)
|
1,005,860/1813667(55.5)
|
|
Statistics (P) a
|
3.477(0.176)
|
–
|
0.102(0.903)
|
7.333(0.002) c
|
4.327(0.020)f
|
|
2014
|
Urban division
|
52/53(98.1)
|
0(0.0)
|
763,558/1646658(46.4)
|
544,900/1014883(53.7)
|
455,518/585660(77.8)
|
|
Suburban district
|
30/30(100.0)
|
40/40(100.0)
|
482,950/1189133(40.6)
|
339,901/432888(78.5)
|
226,946/438707(51.7)
|
|
Rural area
|
24/25(96.0)
|
272/272(100.0)
|
927,679/2268178(40.9)
|
680,973/950174(71.7)
|
421,602/809522(52.1)
|
|
Total
|
106/108(98.2)
|
312/312(100.0)
|
2,174,187/5103969(42.6)
|
1,565,774/2397945(65.3)
|
1,104,066/1833889(60.2)
|
|
Statistics (P) a
|
1.201(0.549)
|
–
|
0.144(0.866)
|
5.816(0.006) d
|
5.278(0.009) g
|
|
2015
|
Urban division
|
52/52(100.0)
|
0(0.0)
|
784,209/1656623(47.3)
|
571,326/1044387(54.7)
|
600,359/469673(78.2)
|
|
Suburban district
|
31/31(100.0)
|
38/38(100.0)
|
492,349/1247302(39.5)
|
332,156/448075(74.1)
|
460,969/233035(50.6)
|
|
Rural area
|
27/27(100.0)
|
270/270(100.0)
|
953,766/2292078(41.6)
|
704,119/944568(74.5)
|
443,276/823395(53.8)
|
|
Total
|
110/110(100.0)
|
308/308(100.0)
|
2,230,324/5196003(42.9)
|
1,607,601/2437030(66.0)
|
1,145,984/1884723(60.8)
|
|
Statistics (P) a
|
–
|
–
|
0.247(0.782)
|
8.170(0.001) e
|
5.870(0.006) h
|
|
2016
|
Urban division
|
53/53(100.0)
|
0(0.0)
|
881,547/1608690(54.8)
|
688,211/1035593(66.5)
|
569,449/592532(96.1)
|
|
Suburban district
|
30/30(100.0)
|
32/32(100.0)
|
510,645/1196288(42.7)
|
347,923/447566(77.7)
|
248,696/448164(55.5)
|
|
Rural area
|
27/27(100.0)
|
268/268(100.0)
|
973,462/2349714(41.4)
|
711,122/955129(74.5)
|
457,366/840055(54.4)
|
|
Total
|
110/110(100.0)
|
300/300(100.0)
|
2,365,654/5154692(45.9)
|
1,747,256/2438288(71.7)
|
1,275,511/1880751(67.8)
|
|
Statistics (P) a
|
–
|
–
|
1.572(0.220)
|
1.245(0.298)
|
7.605(0.002) i
|
|
Statistics (P)b
|
5.604(0.133)
|
0.253(0.859)
|
1.910(0.130)
|
3.783(0.012)j
|
1.696(0.170)
|
- aRefers to the comparison among regions in the same year
- bRefers to the comparison among different years
- cUrban division VS Suburban district (P = 0.001), Urban division VS Rural area (P = 0.005).
- dUrban division VS Suburban district (P = 0.004), Urban division VS Rural area (P = 0.008).
- eUrban division VS Suburban district (P = 0.005), Urban division VS Rural area (P = 0.000)
- fUrban division VS Suburban district (P = 0.006), Urban division VS Rural area (P = 0.005).
- gUrban division VS Suburban district (P = 0.020), Urban division VS Rural area (P = 0.004).
- hUrban division VS Suburban district (P = 0.004), Urban division VS Rural area (P = 0.006).
- iUrban division VS Suburban district (P = 0.003), Urban division VS Rural area (P = 0.001)
- j2013 VS 2014 (P = 0.030), 2013 VS 2015 (P = 0.024), 2013 VS 2016 (P = 0.001)