You are viewing the site in preview mode
Skip to main content
|
Variables
|
Model 1a
|
Model 2b
|
Model 3c
|
|---|
|
Coefficient
|
Adjusted odds ratio (95% CI)
|
p value
|
Coefficient
|
Adjusted odds ratio (95% CI)
|
p value
|
Coefficient
|
Adjusted odds ratio (95% CI)
|
p value
|
|---|
|
Team processes (PREM)
|
|
Low
|
Reference
|
.
|
.
|
.
|
.
|
.
|
Reference
|
.
|
.
|
|
High
|
.
|
.
|
.
|
.
|
.
|
.
|
2.70
|
14.92 (8.11–27.44)
|
< 0.0001
|
|
Role clarity
|
|
Low
|
Reference
|
.
|
.
|
Reference
|
.
|
.
|
Reference
|
.
|
.
|
|
High
|
2.40
|
11.07 (4.45–27.55)
|
< 0.0001
|
1.98
|
7.24 (3.52–14.89)
|
< 0.0001
|
1.11
|
3.02 (1.36–6.73)
|
0.007
|
|
Respondent
|
|
Family
|
Reference
|
.
|
.
|
Reference
|
.
|
.
|
Reference
|
.
|
.
|
|
Patient
|
-0.53
|
0.59 (0.37–0.95)
|
0.029
|
0.14
|
1.15 (0.67–1.95)
|
0.615
|
0.59
|
1.81 (1.02–3.22)
|
0.043
|
|
Sex
|
|
Male
|
Reference
|
.
|
.
|
Reference
|
.
|
.
|
Reference
|
.
|
.
|
|
Female
|
0.36
|
1.43 (0.88–2.31)
|
0.145
|
0.52
|
1.68 (1.03–2.75)
|
0.040
|
0.47
|
1.60 (0.89–2.88)
|
0.114
|
|
Perceived income
|
|
Inadequate
|
Reference
|
.
|
.
|
Reference
|
.
|
.
|
Reference
|
.
|
.
|
|
Adequate
|
0.64
|
1.90 (1.06–3.42)
|
0.032
|
0.48
|
1.62 (0.90–2.91)
|
0.109
|
-0.05
|
0.95 (0.45–2.01)
|
0.891
|
|
Location
|
|
Non urban
|
Reference
|
.
|
.
|
Reference
|
.
|
.
|
Reference
|
.
|
.
|
|
Urban
|
-0.49
|
0.62 (0.40–0.95)
|
0.029
|
0.35
|
1.42 (0.90–2.26)
|
0.134
|
0.82
|
2.27 (1.31–3.95)
|
0.004
|
|
Employment status
|
|
Not employed
|
Reference
|
.
|
.
|
Reference
|
.
|
.
|
Reference
|
.
|
.
|
|
Employed
|
-0.44
|
0.64 (0.40–1.03)
|
0.064
|
0.13
|
1.14 (0.69–1.89)
|
0.613
|
0.65
|
1.92 (1.10–3.36)
|
0.021
|
|
Routine health visit
|
|
No
|
Reference
|
.
|
.
|
Reference
|
.
|
.
|
Reference
|
.
|
.
|
|
Yes
|
0.41
|
1.50 (0.68–3.31
|
0.312
|
1.32
|
3.75 (1.73–8.14)
|
0.001
|
1.59
|
4.90 (1.96–12.22)
|
0.001
|
- aModel 1: Dependent variable: Team processes. Independent variables: Role clarity, Team size, Respondent, Perceived income, Location, Practice setting, Employment status, Marital status, Sex, Length of follow-up, Routine health visit and Country of birth
- Hosmer–Lemeshow: Khi2 = 3.373; ddl = 7; p value 0.848. Backward stepwise likelihood
- bModel 2: Dependent variable: Outcomes of care. Independent variables: Role clarity, Team size, Respondent, Perceived income, Location, Practice setting, Employment status, Marital status, Sex, Length of follow-up, Routine health visit and Country of birth
- Hosmer–Lemeshow: Khi2 = 0.018; ddl = 2; p value 0.991. Backward stepwise likelihood
- cModel 3: Full model Dependent variable: Outcomes of care. Independent variables: Team processes, Role clarity, Team size, Respondent, Perceived income, Location, Practice setting, Employment status, Marital status, Sex, Length of follow-up, Routine health visit and Country of birth
- Hosmer–Lemeshow: Khi2 = 8.632; ddl = 8; p value 0.374. Backward stepwise likelihood
- PREM Patient-reported experience measure, PROM patient-reported outcome measure
